Understanding Pragmatics as a Way to Practice Natural Communication Skills in Various Contexts of Interactions

Leffi Noviyenti; Khairul Anwar

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3243

Understanding Pragmatics as a Way to Practice Natural Communication Skills in Various Contexts of Interactions

Leffi Noviyenti, Khairul Anwar

Abstract

Students’ problems in using English to communicate need to be handled seriously. Teaching English is no more teaching the knowledge of English only but also the use of context. This library research elaborates on the importance of pragmatics for EFL students to improve their communication skills in various contexts of interaction and to strengthen the importance of pragmatic competence for non-native English teachers in teaching natural English communication. Documentation is the collecting technique using a checklist and fieldnote instruments. The primary sources are theories about pragmatics and teaching communication from books and published journals. In order to obtain correct and precise results in analyzing data, a content analysis technique is used. The data analysis procedure covers determining the design, which is linkage analysis, finding main data, and theories about pragmatics from books, then finding contextual knowledge from published research related to pragmatics and teaching English communication, and finally, writing and interpreting the linkage to describe the results. The findings show that pragmatics should not limitedly act as classroom instructions but as competence to be constantly developed and practised for students or teachers. Pragmatics should be seen from its whole aspect in order to communicate naturally and contextually. It can also be concluded that opportunities for pragmatic practice should be provided to achieve the goal of teaching English, that is, the ability to use English in various contexts of interaction.

Keywords

pragmatics competence; natural and contextual communication; English as a foreign language

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afriani, Z. L. (2019). PERAN BUDAYA DALAM PEMEROLEHAN BAHASA ASING. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v1i2.1900

Aitchison, J. (2011). The articulate mammal: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Routledge.

Alcon, Eva. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay—ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0346251X14001389?via%3Dihub

Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

benjamins, John. (2021). The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca | John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00005.hou

Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Vol. 11). MIT press.

Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: Achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261–293.

Han, S. (2021). A Literature Review of the Research Method in the Study of L2 Pragmatic Competence of Chinese Tertiary-Level Students. Sino-US English Teaching, 18(12), 377–382.

Huang, Y. (2017). Neo-Gricean pragmatics. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, 47–78.

Karyawati, Y. S. (2020). PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN PRAGMATIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS PADA SISWA SMP. 6(2).

Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.

Levinson, S. C. (2019). Interactional foundations of language: The interaction engine hypothesis. In Human language: From genes and brain to behavior (pp. 189–200). MIT Press.

Mognon, I., Scholten, I., Hukker, V., & Hendriks, P. (2021). Pragmatics is not a monolithic phenomenon, and neither is theory of mind: Response to Kissine. Language, 97(3), e218–e227.

Nielsen, N. M. (2020). Expanding Searle’s analysis of interrogative speech acts: A systematic classification based on preparatory conditions. Scandinavian Studies in Language, 11(1), 7–19.

Putera Jaya, H., Petrus, I., & Lingga Pitaloka, N. (2022). Speaking Performance and Problems Faced by English Major Students at a University in South Sumatra. South Sumatera. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(1), 105–112.

Sanulita, H. (2019). Pemanfaatan Pendekatan Pragmatik dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Berbasis Pemahaman Lintas Budaya.

Sanusi, Anwar. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis (keenam). Salemba Empat.

Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15548/NSC.V6I1.1555

Steinberg, D. D., & Sciarini, N. V. (2013). An introduction to psycholinguistics. Routledge.

Storch, A. (2019). The idea of a yell: On metapragmatic discourse. International Journal of Language and Culture, 6(1), 10–28.

Taguchi, N. (2015). “Contextually” speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 48, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2014.09.001

Ubaidillah, A. (2020). Pendekatan Pragmatik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Al Ibtida’, 8(2). http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/alibtida/article/view/4318

Youn, soo Jung. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265532214557113

Yule, G. (2022). Oils Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zubkov, A. D. (2020). MOOCs in blended English teaching and learning for students of technical curricula. Proceedings of the Conference “Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives,” 539–546.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3243